There’s been a lot of talk about a Third Offset Strategy at the Defense Department lately. It’s part of Defense Secretary Ash Carter’s plan to make sure the U.S. military remains the world’s finest fighting force.
The Third Offset Strategy has a number of parts to it, so at first glance, it may appear complicated. Lucky for you, my job was to break down some of the more technical aspects into layman’s terms.
Basically, an offset strategy is part of a long-term competitive strategy; a peacetime competition between rival defense establishments that aims to generate and sustain strategic advantage. Offset strategies are not about formulating a general unified theory for armed conflict. They instead aim to bolster and extend U.S. conventional deterrence against great powers able to produce or acquire technologically advanced weapons systems.
It’s how we strengthen our military’s competitive edge. Offset strategies are not solely about technological approaches, although all offset strategies have a powerful technological component. They are about finding the right combination of technologies and operational and organizational constructs to achieve decisive operational advantage and thus bolster conventional deterrence.
It’s something we’ve done successfully twice before.
The First Offset began during the early 1950s at the start of the Cold War. The Soviet Union had a geographical advantage over the U.S. in Western Europe, so we exploited our nuclear superiority to overcome it, miniaturizing our nukes to about the size of a football. It was an effective strategy until the Soviets caught up to us in the nuke game. That’s when we moved into…
The Second Offset of the 1970s and ’80s, where we focused on conventional munitions with near-zero miss, precision-guided weapons and the joint battle networks that employed them. The key drivers to this strategy were information technologies and the digital microprocessor that changed the game in terms of sensors and the weapons carried by our platforms.
Since then, however, we’ve seen a reemergence of “great power” competition – particularly with China and Russia. Simply put, both are catching up to us in military capabilities, and both are investing heavily in Second Offset technologies, as well as cyber and electronic warfare that could erode the enormous advantages we’ve enjoyed in conventional warfare.
So it’s time for a Third Offset Strategy. As it has been in the past, technological and operational innovation will be the key to it. Maintaining – and in select areas, extending – our competitive, technological and operational advantages is not a purely quantitative contest vis-à-vis these nations. Rather, the U.S. must seek asymmetric advantages that capitalize on its strengths and exploit adversary weaknesses.
The Third Offset Strategy harnesses our intellectual activity in a way that transcends any particular technological trend. But research points us in the direction of five common technological-operational components:
These machines would be used for indications and warnings in cyber defense, electronic warfare attacks and large-density missile raids when human reactions just aren’t fast enough. They would also be used for big-data analytics; for example, a deep-learning system might be able to analyze 90,000 Facebook post made by ISIL in one day, crunch that data and find patterns from it, pulling out what might be of use.
The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency is also working on two programs, Adaptive Radar Countermeasures and Behavioral Learning for Adaptive Electronic Warfare. They can, for example, help EA-18G pilots whose equipment has sensed an unknown radar signal figure out how to take care of it during the mission instead of having to bring that information back to its base for analysis.
This teams up human insight with the tactical acuity of computers by allowing machines to help humans make better, faster decisions. Pairing the two will combine the ability of humans to think on the fly with the quick problem-solving methods of artificial intelligence.
Current examples of this are unmanned underwater vehicle systems and the Aegis weapon system — a naval system that uses computers and radar to track and guide weapons to destroy enemy targets.
There’s also the F-35 which, when fully developed, will be a flying sensor that can take in a huge amount of data, analyze it and then display it on the pilot’s helmet, allowing him to make better decisions.
Human-Machine Combat Teaming
While the above collaboration helps humans make better decisions, human-machine combat teaming actually works with the unmanned systems to perform operations.
Two current examples of this are the Army’s Apache helicopter and Gray Eagle Unmanned Aerial Vehicle, and the Navy’s P-8 aircraft and Triton UAV. Both are designed to operate together.
There are also swarming UAV’s like the Perdix mini-drone, which has a 3D-printed airframe and electronics made from cellphones. Only about a foot long, the Perdix can be launched from an unmanned aircraft and fly in close proximity to several identical drones, communicating with them to complete a mission.
Assisted Human Operations
These are pretty easy to understand: They’re wearable electronics, combat apps, heads-up displays and even exoskeletons that can help warfighters in all possible contingencies. At the Air Force Research Lab, they’re perfecting skin biosensors that look and feel like a Bandaid, except they’re equipped to read all sorts of data, like your heart rate, hydration and other vital signs. Basically, assisted human operational components will be like that back-up sensor in your car that beeps when you’re getting close to hitting something — it’s assisting you in driving the car.
Network-Enabled, Cyber-Hardened Weapons
This component is also pretty simple — it’s the prioritization of cyber-security.
Everything’s online today — we all know that — which means every weapon and system will have to be prepared for cyber-attacks. For example, the DoD is modifying existing systems, like the small-diameter bomb, to operate completely without GPS if an enemy is somehow able to deny it service.
While the Second Offset Strategy had only one opponent — the Soviets — the Third Offset Strategy will focus on the advanced capabilities that multiple opponents might eventually bear in a high-end conflict. If we stay ahead of them in that game, it can give us an edge across all military operations.
There’s a lot more to the Third Offset Strategy, of course, that will be discussed as we figure out how to use the above systems and operate them together. But for now, just know that the integration of human thinking and artificial intelligence is going to be the key to the Force of the Future!
Also see: Learning Systems, Autonomy and Human-Machine Teaming
From the DoD Live Blog, the official blog of the U.S. Defense Department: http://www.dodlive.mil/.
Follow the Department of Defense on Facebook and Twitter!